Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Pricing & Specs

Anthropic vs DeepSeek, side by side from a live registry. Specs below, then benchmark both on your own task.

$5
Claude Haiku 4.5 output / 1M
$1.32
DeepSeek-V4-Flash output / 1M
200K / 1M
context windows

TL;DR: On a typical task (1K input + 500 output tokens), DeepSeek-V4-Flash is about 3.2x cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5. But per-token price is not cost per result: a cheaper model that needs more tokens, retries, or hand-holding can end up more expensive on your workload. The specs below are facts; which one is better at YOUR task is measurable, not guessable.

API Pricing: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash

TokensClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Input$1 / 1M$0.44 / 1M
Output$5 / 1M$1.32 / 1M
Cached input$0.1 / 1M$0.014 / 1M

What that means in practice (1K input + 500 output tokens)

1x One typical task: $0.0035 on Claude Haiku 4.5 vs $0.0011 on DeepSeek-V4-Flash
1K 1,000 runs: $3.50 vs $1.10
💡 Real cost depends on how verbose each model is on YOUR prompts. Benchmark to measure actual tokens, not estimates.

Specs Compared

SpecClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Context window200K tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens64K tokens384K tokens
Input modalitiestext, imagetext
Knowledge cutoff--
Latency (measured)~847ms median response-
Reasoning modelYesYes
Tool / function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingYesYes

When to Choose Which

High volume on a budget: start with DeepSeek-V4-Flash; only pay for Claude Haiku 4.5 if the benchmark shows a quality gap that matters.
Long documents or big codebases: DeepSeek-V4-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 200K tokens).
Everything else: the honest answer is to benchmark both on your actual task. Quality differences are task-specific and shift with every release.

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash?

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/$5 per 1M input/output tokens; DeepSeek-V4-Flash costs $0.44/$1.32. On a typical task (1K input + 500 output tokens), DeepSeek-V4-Flash is about 3.2x cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash?

Claude Haiku 4.5 has a 200K-token context window; DeepSeek-V4-Flash has 1M tokens.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than DeepSeek-V4-Flash?

It depends on the task. Generic leaderboards won't tell you which one wins on YOUR workload. OpenMark lets you benchmark Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek-V4-Flash head to head on your own task with real API calls, no API keys needed, free tier available.

Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash for YOUR Task?

Spec tables can't answer that. Run both head to head on your actual workload:
real API calls, ranked results with accuracy, cost, and latency. Free tier available.

Benchmark Both Free →

Get the monthly model change report

New models, API price changes, and retirements, straight from the registry that powers OpenMark. One email a month.