Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max
Pricing & Specs
xAI vs Qwen (Alibaba), side by side from a live registry. Specs below, then benchmark both on your own task.
TL;DR: On a typical task (1K input + 500 output tokens), Qwen3.7 Max is about 1.6x cheaper than Grok 4.5. But per-token price is not cost per result: a cheaper model that needs more tokens, retries, or hand-holding can end up more expensive on your workload. The specs below are facts; which one is better at YOUR task is measurable, not guessable.
API Pricing: Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max
| Tokens | Grok 4.5 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $2 / 1M | $1.25 / 1M |
| Output | $6 / 1M | $3.75 / 1M |
| Cached input | $0.3 / 1M | $0.13 / 1M |
What that means in practice (1K input + 500 output tokens)
Specs Compared
| Spec | Grok 4.5 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 500K tokens | 1M tokens |
| Max output tokens | - | - |
| Input modalities | text, image | text |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
| Latency (measured) | - | - |
| Reasoning model | Yes | Yes |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes |
| JSON mode | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt caching | Yes | Yes |
When to Choose Which
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or Qwen3.7 Max?
Grok 4.5 costs $2/$6 per 1M input/output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.25/$3.75. On a typical task (1K input + 500 output tokens), Qwen3.7 Max is about 1.6x cheaper than Grok 4.5.
Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.5 or Qwen3.7 Max?
Grok 4.5 has a 500K-token context window; Qwen3.7 Max has 1M tokens.
Is Grok 4.5 better than Qwen3.7 Max?
It depends on the task. Generic leaderboards won't tell you which one wins on YOUR workload. OpenMark lets you benchmark Grok 4.5 and Qwen3.7 Max head to head on your own task with real API calls, no API keys needed, free tier available.
Grok 4.5 or Qwen3.7 Max for YOUR Task?
Spec tables can't answer that. Run both head to head on your actual workload:
real API calls, ranked results with accuracy, cost, and latency. Free tier available.