LLM Leaderboard?
Build Your Own.

Generic leaderboards rank models on standardized tests. But your production task isn't standardized. Create a personal AI model leaderboard that ranks 100+ models on YOUR actual use case.

The Problem with LLM Leaderboards

LMSYS Chatbot Arena, Open LLM Leaderboard, MMLU rankings — they all suffer from the same problems:

Problem

Benchmark Contamination

Models may have trained on test data. A model scoring 92% on MMLU might score 65% on a novel, unseen task — like YOUR use case.

Problem

No Cost Data

Leaderboards rank by accuracy alone. A model that's 3% better but costs 50x more isn't the "best" for production workloads.

Problem

Generic Tasks

MMLU tests general knowledge. HumanEval tests Python. Your customer support, legal review, or data extraction pipeline isn't tested anywhere.

Problem

Subjective Voting

Arena-style leaderboards use human voting — subjective, noisy, and biased toward verbose/confident-sounding responses.

Custom LLM leaderboard showing models ranked by accuracy, cost, and speed on a specific task

A real OpenMark leaderboard — YOUR task, YOUR rankings, YOUR data.

Your Custom LLM Leaderboard

OpenMark lets you create a leaderboard that matters — one based on YOUR actual prompts and use cases:

📊 Accuracy ranking: Models scored deterministically on your expected outputs — same result every run.
💰 Cost ranking: See real API costs for YOUR task — not just per-token rates.
Speed ranking: Latency measured per request — find the fastest model for real-time applications.
📈 Accuracy-per-dollar: The metric that actually matters — which model gives the most quality for your budget?
🔄 Stability ranking: Run multiple times to see consistency — critical for production systems.
100+
Models Ranked
15+
Providers
6
Sortable Metrics

Leaderboard You Can Sort

Unlike static leaderboards, OpenMark's results table is interactive. Sort by any column to find the model that fits your priority:

RankModelScoreCostAcc/$Speed
1claude-sonnet-4.5
Anthropic
82%$0.0038118.5K24s
2gpt-4o
OpenAI
78%$0.004595.2K18s
3deepseek-v3
DeepSeek
75%$0.0003878.8K22s
4gemini-2.5-flash
Google
73%$0.0005450.1K15s

↑ Example data. YOUR leaderboard will reflect YOUR task's results.

"We replaced our weekly leaderboard check with a monthly OpenMark benchmark on our actual production prompts. We caught a model regression that leaderboards missed — our production pipeline would have broken."

FAQ

How is this different from the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?

Chatbot Arena ranks by human voting on random conversations — subjective and generic. OpenMark ranks by deterministic scoring on YOUR actual prompts, with cost and speed data included.

Can I compare my rankings over time?

Yes. Run the same benchmark monthly to track model improvements, regressions, and pricing changes. Your benchmark history is saved for comparison.

Does this replace standard benchmarks?

Not entirely. Standard benchmarks are useful for general capability assessment. But for production decisions, you need a leaderboard based on YOUR specific task. Learn more about custom benchmarking →

Build Your Own LLM Leaderboard

Rank 100+ models on YOUR task. Real data, not generic scores.
Free tier — no credit card required.

Create Your Leaderboard — Free →